Supreme Court rules for Samsung in five year smartphone patent fight with Apple

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with Samsung in its big-money smartphone patent fight with Apple, throwing out an appeals court ruling that said the South Korean company had to pay a $399 million penalty to its American rival for copying key iPhone designs.

The justices in their 8-0 ruling sent the case back to the lower court for further proceedings.

The decision gives Samsung another chance to try to get back a big chunk of the money it paid Apple in December following a 2012 jury verdict that it infringed Apple’s iPhone patents and mimicked its distinctive appearance in making the Galaxy and other competing devices.

READ Also  Microsoft and Samsung React While Google, Linux Foundation and Others Remain Silent to Vault 7 CIA Leaks

The court held that a patent violator does not always have to fork over its entire profits from the sales of products using stolen designs, if the designs covered only certain components and not the whole thing.

The ruling followed a ferocious legal battle between the world’s top two smartphone manufacturers that began in 2011 when Apple sued Samsung, asserting that its rival stole its technology and the iPhone’s trademarked appearance.

It was one of the most closely watched patent cases to come before the top U.S. court in recent years.

Samsung had been seeking to pare back $399 million of $548 million it paid Apple in December following a 2012 jury verdict finding that it infringed Cupertino, California-based Apple’s iPhone patents and copied its distinctive appearance.

READ Also  World's first zero-emission hydrogen train to begin operations in Germany

After a trial in 2012, Apple was awarded nearly $930 million in damages. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington in May 2015 upheld the patent infringement verdict, but said the iPhone’s appearance could not be protected through trademarks.

That cut Samsung’s damages back by $382 million.

The legal dispute centered on whether the term ‘article of manufacture’ in U.S. patent law should be interpreted as a finished product in its entirety, or merely a component in a complex product.




Welcome! Login in to your account

Remember me Lost your password?

Lost Password